Is it just me? How to check if a problem is actually widespread
Your own frustration is a sample size of one, and you can’t tell from the inside whether it’s universal or just you. Here’s how to check before you bet on it.
The trap of your own experience
When something frustrates you daily, it feels obviously universal — surely everyone hits this. But your experience is a sample size of one, and from the inside you genuinely cannot tell whether you’ve found a widespread problem or just an idiosyncrasy of how you work.
Both errors are expensive. Build for a problem only you have and nobody shows up; dismiss a problem as “just me” when it’s everywhere and you walk past an opportunity. The fix is the same in both directions: check the breadth before you commit.
Two ways to be wrong
The first failure mode is overgeneralising — assuming your niche annoyance is a mass-market need. The second is underestimating — assuming you’re alone when, in fact, thousands quietly share the problem but nobody’s aggregated their voices.
You can’t reason your way out of either from your own chair. You need to go look at whether other people, in their own words, describe the same thing.
How to check breadth
Turning “is it just me?” into something you can actually answer:
- Search the exact frustration in the words you’d use — see if anyone else says it
- Count the recurrence — once is an anecdote, fifty times is a pattern
- Read the range of contexts — does it span different people and situations, or one narrow group?
- Note who has it — the breadth of who complains tells you how big the “who” really is
- Watch for the workarounds — independent people solving it the same way is strong confirmation
From anecdote to prevalence — honestly
The pipeline answers this by counting. It pulls the threads where people describe the problem, scores each for how acute the pain is, and shows you frequency across hundreds of posts — so “I feel this strongly” becomes “here are 80 people describing the same thing, this hard.”
One honest caveat: Reddit is not a census. It skews toward the engaged and the frustrated, so it tells you a problem is real and roughly how intense — not what share of the whole population has it. Use it to escape the sample-size-of-one trap, then size the market with other tools before you bet the company on it.
See the full workflow
Sanity-checking a personal hunch against real experiences is a use-case the pipeline is built for.
Personal validationKeep reading
Find out if it is just you — or everyone
Sanity-check your own experience against what people actually say.
Read →Validate your startup idea with evidence, not optimism
Test a SaaS or startup idea against real demand before you build.
Read →Reddit research: using Reddit as a serious research source
A founder spends a weekend reading 300 threads in three subreddits and walks away knowing exactly how customers describe their problem. This is the guide to doing that on purpose, without fooling yourself.
Read →Revealed vs stated preference
Surveys capture what people say they want. Behaviour reveals what they actually want. The gap is where most products die.
Read →Demand signals: real interest vs polite encouragement
“That’s a great idea!” is encouragement, not demand. Here’s how to tell the signals that predict a sale from the ones that just feel nice.
Read →